Dr.Jeff
True Classic
While I understand what you are trying to say about the fixed position of the UT sprayers relative to the piston location, there will be a difference in the actual contact area of that spray as the piston moves up and down. It is a matter of geometry and physics.
For what it's worth, the Cummings sprayers also have a check valve to prevent spray under a set pressure. So really no significant functional difference from the Fiat ones. What I'm not sure about is the volume of oil (size of orifice) that either ones passes.
It appears to me there is a groove in the back of the bearing shells that delivers oil to the rod squirters all the time, regardless of the cross drilled holes in the crank. That might depend on the brand and part number of bearings used? Isn't this the same principle for the oil supply to the bearing/crank journal surfaces, the cross drilled holes supply constant oil due to a groove in the front surface of the shell?
For what it's worth, the Cummings sprayers also have a check valve to prevent spray under a set pressure. So really no significant functional difference from the Fiat ones. What I'm not sure about is the volume of oil (size of orifice) that either ones passes.
It appears to me there is a groove in the back of the bearing shells that delivers oil to the rod squirters all the time, regardless of the cross drilled holes in the crank. That might depend on the brand and part number of bearings used? Isn't this the same principle for the oil supply to the bearing/crank journal surfaces, the cross drilled holes supply constant oil due to a groove in the front surface of the shell?
Last edited: