Thanks for the response, appreciate it.My ring gaps too were big and outside the OEM Fiat spec. I had a hard time finding rings that would be one size larger to trim to spec. I considered shipping them to a company in California per recommendation from a friend to do a Gapless bridge for each. I gave him my gaps and he was like, your gaps are well within modern day OEM standards and recommended I not worry about it at all. Still worrying, but not near as much.
I cannot remember what ring gaps are most important to be larger or smaller than the next. Concentrate your research on gaps in comparison to each other to see how important it is.
I cannot remember what ring gaps are most important to be larger or smaller than the next. Concentrate your research on gaps in comparison to each other to see how important it is.
Thank you Andrew! That is good news to hear for both the OP and I! I did run into threads on the interwebs that hinted at exactly that. Do you have a link to the actual article?Some testing was done by the guys at HotRod Magazine some time back and they played with ring gap on a dyno. Checked crank case pressure and compression after seating. They found negligible difference in all tests and dyno numbers. If I remember correctly they went as large as 0.100 inch gap.
Also, on a side note. The more modern multi piece oil rings are not gapped the same as the old single piece. As the gaps don't align they function similar to a gapless ring and this allows them to run very large gaps while sealing better than before. Just check them to be sure the gaps are at least as large as the stock spec and slap them in.