34 DMTR Jetting

robsad

True Classic
I just spent an hour Googling info on jetting this carb and came up with many, many different combinations. Finally got around to taking my carb apart and found my jetting to be this :

Idle 50 / 50
Main 125 / 130
Air Corr 195 / 220
Em Tube F30 / F30

Seems my secondary idle jet is way too small and might be the cause of my hesitation according to some. Most combos call for 80 or 100. Any thoughts on where I should change things keeping in mind that this carb 1500 sputters and hesitates from idle to 3000 RPM ?
 
Cast into the side of the carb body should be two numbers, like 24-26...which indicates the venturi size that the dmtr in question is fabricated with. This is pretty vital info to determine what would be the best change to make to try and fix this issue.

SteveC
 
One data point

I have:
Idle 50 / 50
Main 125 / 150
Air Corr 160 / 240
Em Tube F30 / F30

Runs fine.
1300CC. Faza 35-75 cam. K&N filter. Stock ignition. Stock valve sizes.
Don't know the venturi size without looking.
 
cut and paste of other posts of mine on this subject.

According to my Weber bible, the 34DATR 2/250 is standard fitment to a Lancia Beta 2000. (beta 1600 is a 34datr 1/250)

primary venturi 25mm
secondary venturi 27mm
diffuser 4.00
primary main 1.20
secondary main 1.50
primary idle 0.50
secondary idle 0.80
primary air corrector 1.70
secondary air corrector 2.40
emulsion tube F30
pump jet 0.50
needle/seat 1.75

I can scan the page from my book if you need more info, but it's in Italian.

Rules of thumb with carb setup....

A larger air corrector weakens the mixture more at higher than lower RPM.

As a rule of thumb, 3 progressions of air corrector (say 1.50 down to 1.35... so 3 x 0.5mm jumps) equals (roughly) one step up in main jet size (say from 1.50 to 1.55)

Increasing the main jet orifice size enriches the mixture uniformly at high and low engine speeds.

Both these metered parts are linear in their numbering... so a bigger suffix = a larger orifice... however when it comes to emulsion tubes, this goes out the window and you need to consult reference tables to decide what is richer/ leaner... as E tubes doesn't follow a numerical progression... just to make life interesting...

if you want a copy of the E tube table, I can scan it and post with cross reference to general applications and changes

Emulsion tubes have more influence at small throttle angles and during accelerations, significant factors that influence it's operation are the outside and inside diameters of the E-tube, which alters the amount of fuel that is displaced in the jet well, generally a thinner tube is richer as it will leave more fuel in the jet well for the engine to draw on.

The location, size and numbers of holes that it has along its length control how the fuel is emulsified as the fuel is drawn from the jet well thru the primary venturi.

idle jet size on the secondary will affect how the carb comes onto the transition phase between the idle circuit and the main....that's when the throttle blade is about 1/4 of the way opened.... and the idle jets also spill fuel at WOT.

Look in your Haynes manual on page 56 and 57, these are pics from the OE specifications manual. The three pics on the top of page 57 show idle on the idle mixture screw, primary transition and secondary transition respectively. The fuel to the secondary transition ports is metered by the secondary idle jet.

Idle theory
<So the secondary idle jet only comes into play at secondary transition? If so, it has nothing to do with my long-standing idle issue. Correct?>
Yes that's correct.

<When idling, fuel is delivered via the idle passage (item 37 on Haynes page 57). Amount is controlled by idle mixture screw.>

Again, spot on correct. Prim idle passage is also notated as 35, before the idle jet where fuel is draw from the main jet well. Not really shown on the idle mixture screw (39) is an O ring, this is VITAL for correct idle mixture, otherwise air is drawn down the idle mixture screw threads. The idle mixture screw should also have a very fine point, when they are overtightened, the fine tip can bend / be flattened out, which will affect the idle mixture control. Once the throttle blades move past the primary throat progression ports, fuel flow is controlled by the primary idle jet

<The idle speed adjustment opens/closes the primary butterfly, correct? At idle, should the primary butterfly be completely closed? (if so, what's the point of the idle speed adjustment screw?).>

Correct, the idle speed screw is shown on page 58, notated as item 19, it has a spring to hold it in tension so it can't back itself out. At idle the butterfly is almost completely closed, the purpose of the idle speed screw is actually more of a throttle stop, to prevent the butterfly bashing the sides of the carb, instead it comes to rest on this stopper. The idle stop screw should JUST be holding the prim throttle blade off its absolute stop.

<I'm beginning to convince myself that I have a blockage somewhere in the idle passage. I can set the idle to 1000 rpm using the idle speed screw. Go for a drive and it idles at 1800. Return home and I can completely close the idle mixture screw and it still idles at 1800. Reopen mixture screw 1.5 turns, back out speed screw until 1000 rpm, all seems fine, turn your back and she stumbles and slowly dies.>

Classic symptoms of blocked (or partially blocked) idle fuel cicuit, or an air leak into the idle circuit (which will not let the fuel be lifted from the main jet well into the idle circuit), or too small an idle jet on the primary (but this would be if you had a long duration cam and low manifold vacuum)

I would be stripping the carb, and really concentrating on passages 35 and 37, there are some excellent spray throttle body cleaners available these days, try some of this and then blow out with compressed air, concentrate on the prim idle circuit.

Other thing to check would be vacuum leaks at the manifold fittings. Our 78 x19's have a takeoff for the fast idle check device, this can leak air and upset the idle metering too. That's the fitting on top of the manifold, on the runner to number 4. The fast idle actuation device (not shown in the haynes manual) attaches to the "rear" of the carb just below the gasket line, and when vacuum is supplied to its diapragm, actuates a lever to raise the idle up to around 1800 revs ... I prefer to cap these off myself, all this circuit does is provide a fast idle for CO check (and who does those in Australia!) it contributes nothing to the operation of the carb.

SteveC
 
Steve,
My primary air corrector is a 195 compared to 170 for the Weber specs. Would this make a big difference in leaning out this engine ?
 
As a rule of thumb .... 3 steps up (15 numerically) in air corrector size (introducing more air - so going leaner) is roughly the equivalent of one step down or decrease (going leaner, so 5 numerically) in main jet size.

195 a/c is 5 steps leaner then a 170 a/c ...roughly the equivalent of going back to a 112 main jet from the 120 main that you would typically expect, so yes it is likely to introduce a lean condition at the mid to top end of the primary IMO.

SteveC
 
Steve,
From idle, when I dump the throttle the rpm's bog down and the engine almost dies. If I add throttle slowly it will rev fine. I just took this carb apart, boiled it, cleaned all passages and jets with carb cleaner and blew everything out with compressed air. I put it back together with new gaskets, o-rings and new accel pump diaphragm. I also took both manifolds off and installed new manifold gaskets thinking I might have an air leak. All this didn't make any difference with the hesitation. I checked the timing, it's about 8 degrees BTDC at idle. The accel pump jets are working fine. Am I expecting too much for this engine to have instant throttle response ? This engine is an 86 FI crate motor that I removed the FI system and put on a 1500 carb manifold.
 
OH! You have a former FI 1500 now running a carb!

What ignition and distributor are you using?

If its the '74 then the dizzy RETARDS and does not advance with vacuum if I recall correctly.

Secondly, an FI 1500 should be initially set at 10 degrees BTDC. If the Stock 1500 ICM and Dizzy are used you should see a total of about 28 degrees advance with the vacuum and centrifugal contributing almost equal parts.

ALSO... be sure your dizzy on your 34 is absent at IDLE. The port should be on the HIGH SIDE of the throttle plate and not below it. On 32's this does NOT exist and an orifice needs to be drilled using a spare factory casting hole and a bung installed.

I am unsure if 34s need this, but here is a link from Version 1.0 showing how to do the mod:

http://www.network54.com/Forum/1215...CARBS,+Exploded+Views,+Parts+List,+Vacuum+Mod

This really makes a difference but not to the point of an engine dying, but for a smoother transition and actually better acceleration for the street.

I gotta say this though... I trust what you say and what you did, but IMHO I think there is still something going on IN that carb. I'm wondering if you could BORROW another or even ASK HERE to borrow another and SEE for sure. It need not be a 34, even a 28/30 or a 32 will do... just to see if this MASSIVE BOG of yours goes away.

HTH
 
Tony,
I have the Marelli Plex electronic ignition sold by IAP. No vacuum advance. It was suggested that my FAZA 35/75 cam may be off a half tooth. I'm going to check this. Which way ( advanced or retarded) might cause this ?
 
OK now I'm beginning to get a handle on what your spec you engine is.... you've not been giving ALL the details Rob, and it's important to the diagnosis.

I've built LOTS of engines that come close to and around your spec... and haven't had this issue, so the devil is in the detail.

For a start let me say I think the Faza (and even more so the PBS regrinds) cams are pretty much rubbish from a performance perspective. Al C sold stuff mostly that couldn't really be considered true performance parts, most was "boy racer" stuff and barely better than the stock emissions components. The PBS and Faza cams have many times been found to have large lobe to lobe variations both in timing and lift. They were ground by humans and human error was introduced. Fiat computer grinds their camshafts, just as Pittatore does, and the lobe to lobe variations are NON existent.... it's certainly not an opinion that everyone will agree with, but hey, I do a lot of this stuff, much more than almost anyone else around here, and I don't believe the hype and anecdotal "evidence", I work in facts and figures, and always call a spade a spade, unless it's a shovel. end rant.

At the moment you have two issues unfortunately, low compression in cyl 2, and this ever present (since build) poor reaction to sudden throttle angle changes.

What cylinder head are we talking about? Do you have a head with the full circular decompression recess? If your at 8.5:1 and have introduced extended valve open duration, your dynamic compression ratio has gone backwards....this equals lack lustre performance....add to this the known to exist timing variations, and I'm simply not surprised at your result.

I think if you check your manifold vacuum it will be poor, due to cam timing issues. It looks like the head will need to come off soon anyway to fix a valve issue, be prepared to alter your mix and match of parts to get a more balanced engine and the result you want... at very least a vernier timing gear is needed to get the cam timing correct.... but it's anyone's guess where "correct" is... personally I use manifold vacuum and EGT's to set the cam up in the sweet spot, YMMV.

SteveC
 
One data point

I have:
Idle 50 / 50
Main 125 / 150
Air Corr 160 / 240
Em Tube F30 / F30

Runs fine.
1300CC. Faza 35-75 cam. K&N filter. Stock ignition. Stock valve sizes.
Don't know the venturi size without looking.
I just set up a 34 DATA on my 1300 128 3P - with a ported inlet, mild cam, electronic ignition and extractors - using as close as I could to the settings above. I went with idles of 50 on both throats; 120 (primary) and 150 (2ndry) for the mains; and air correctors of 170 (primary) and 220 (2ndry). The emulsion tubes were both F30s. I didn’t have the exact recommended jets, etc; I scavenged them from spare carbies. This works quite well and has overcome an issue I had when running a 70 2ndry idle, which caused the engine to bog down quite badly when taking off from stopped. I’ll have a specialist do a full tune but this has the car reasonably drivable and with more grunt that it did with the stock 32 DMTR.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top